Hi Brian, On Sun, 2005-05-22 at 23:00 -0700, Brian Stansberry wrote: > --- Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * Brian: if Robert's ok with this (and no-one else > > votes -1), will you prepare an actual patch or > > should I? > > > > I'd be happy to.
Any progress on creating the patch? NB: several small patches would be better than one big patch I think, ie * one patch to fix testing for loglib availability * one patch for treating failure to cast the result to Log as just unavailability of the lib rather than complete failure to init logging (as is currently done). * one patch for caching messages re inability to configure a discovered Log adapter for reporting later via another logger, as you suggested in one email. Of course this assumes that it isn't overly complicated to create independent patches for this. > > > By the way, Brian, are you an Apache committer? > > > > No. Well, I'm sure we can fix that if you wish! I think you'd be a great addition to the commons community. If you are interested, then the best time to propose a vote on this is probably soon after committing a couple of patches provided by you.. Regards, Simon --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
