DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG� RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33840>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND� INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33840 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-09 09:01 ------- I agree that PropertyUtils.isReadable(obj, propname) should not be returning true for public properties of non-public classes. And the patch looks fine. However I am concerned about backwards compatibility if we change the behaviour of an existing method to report false where it used to report true. An alternative would be to create a separate method PropertyUtils.isReadableProperty or somesuch which has the new behaviour, and then deprecate the old method. By the way, whatever change is made probably should be applied to PropertyUtils.isWriteable too. Comments? -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
