I'm also +1 to a separate [csv] component for the reasons already conveyed.
On 6/9/05, Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I must say that I agree with Henri that this merits its own component. > IMO it doesn't fit into [lang] and would look strange within [io] or > [codec]. CSV is a topic that comes up every now and then and if this > could be solved once and for all then a separate component would be > justified if only for it to be easily found which it wouldn't be if it > were hidden in one of the existing packages. > > Too bad I don't have time to help. CSV stuff bit me more than a couple > of times in the past. Thanks to Henri for putting some energy into it. > > On 09.06.2005 06:09:13 Kevin Gessner wrote: > > On 6/8/05, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > <snip> > > > > > > Another question is where the code should go. [lang] and [io] have > > > been suggested, as has a [csv] component. I'll go as far as to say > > > that [csv] is the direction we should go and see if anybody disagrees > > > :) > > > > Some sort of CVS utility sounds like a smashing idea. But I > > respectfully disagree with your placement, Hen. I don't see why we > > would need a whole new component for something that comfortably fits > > into [io] or [lang]. > > > Jeremias Maerki > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Steven Caswell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Take back the web - http://www.mozilla.org
