DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG� RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34819>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND� INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34819 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-09 20:14 ------- (In reply to comment #12) > Sorry, I don't understand your last comment. Sorry I didn't have time for this last week - but I think I now have a better understanding http://www.sfu.ca/~jdbates/tmp/commons-digester/TestCreateElement.java - this test case shows how aelfred's getLocalName() always returns the tag name, even of elements created using the DOM1 createElement(String) method - fis% jikes-sablevm TestCreateElement.java fis% java TestCreateElement getNodeName(): foo getLocalName(): foo fis% Consequently, I don't think - assertNull(((Element)element).getLocalName()); - can ever succeed? I thought this is what you meant by - > However it seems that Aelfred provides localname even when namespace-aware is > false. And the specs say this is allowed. - > If you've applied the attached patch to the latest SVN code, and are still > getting the assert failures then I've made a mistake somewhere. That's correct - I applied your patch to latest SVN & asserts on lines 209, 240, 248 & 256 of NodeCreateRuleTestCase.java still fail - but I gathered that non-null values were permissable, according to the spec? Many thanks, again, for your time on this problem! Jack -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
