>From what I can tell, the distributions below needed to be signed differently and more votes are still needed.
I'm +1 on the release, but believe we need to repackage for the release. Anyone else care to vote or have opinions about the distribution? On 3/12/05, Eric Pugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > A couple of packaging issues were discovered in Email 1.0 RC3. I was > encouraged to fix them and then call for a fresh vote, so I appreciate > the understanding of the community that the (now) 4 release candidates > it's taken to get email to 1.0. My first time signing a project. > > The release candidate is available at > http://www.apache.org/~epugh/email/distributions/ and is just RC3 with > some packaging tweaks, not Java code changes. The documentation is > available at http://www.apache.org/~epugh/email/docs > > This is a full release vote (and so three +1's are required). please > check the release before voting +1. i will not tally the votes before > 2300 hours GMT on Tuesday 15th of March. > > here's my +1 > > - Eric > > -8<------------------------------------------------------------- > [ ] +1 Promote RC4 to commons-email-1.0 > [ ] +0 In favour of this release > [ ] -0 Against this release > [ ] -1 Do not release RC4 > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/ "You are going to let the fear of poverty govern your life and your reward will be that you will eat, but you will not live." - George Bernard Shaw --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
