>> Looks like Stephen checked in some fixes. Stephen what do you reckon? > > > Everything is OK for a release. If someone really wanted to, they could > write isExtensionOnSystem() methods to match the rest of the style of > the class, but they are non-essential, and I haven't got the itch.
Ok ...cool >> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34601 >> Seems to be an easy fix. Can someone commit it? > > Done Thanks! >> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32761 >> Looks like a useful addition and comes with a testcase. >> ...but introduces a dep to regexp :-/ Reject it because >> of that? What's the minimum jre requirement for commons-io? >> If 1.4 we could use the JDK regexp classes instead. > > We depend on JDK1.2, so this can't happen unless we use reflection which > seems OTT. Maybe there can be a JDK1.5 version of [io] to go with the > JDK1.5 collections that we'll probably end up with...... Hm.. having JDK specific version is a PITA. But anyway ...target is 1.2 so I let's reject the patch for now? >> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34173 >> This one looks really useful! Could someone cross check >> and commit. Also comes with testcases. >> >> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33759 >> Not sure about the implications but also sounds reasonable. > > Both could be done, but wouldn't block a release. Ok > The main tasks for a release are all the release notes, clirr, jdiff, > release candidates, votes etc Is the process docoumented somewhere? cheers -- Torsten
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
