> I find the general approach quite brilliant. It might be the right
> answer to the bigger problem of testing class loader related issues with
> Junit instead of through a static main method. However, the approach has
> the disadvantage of displacing some of the test logic into junit. Of
> course, the displacement in logic is unavoidable by construction.
> 
> You have either created a new testing idiom to be followed by many java
> developers,

You already got me interested - jci and javaflow also need
to test classloaders ...and frankly - the current approach
just sucks ;)

cheers
--
Torsten

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to