On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 16:37 -0500, Brian K. Wallace wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > robert burrell donkin wrote:
<snip> > I was sensing an issue with that patch when it was brought up, but > didn't have the time to take to investigate why. As it's still pre-1.0, > I'm +1 (non-binding). As for "subsequent release", I think it should > definitely be on tap for the "next" release as it's known prior to this one. the actual code was definitely in error. i've completed the unfinished test case (which covers only the simplest case) and committed that with the fix to HEAD but suspect that this approach will have some limitations/issues. if feel like creating and contributing some more complex test cases to either confirm or deny your intuition, they be much appreciated :) - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
