On Sun, 2005-07-17 at 00:43 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: > I agree with Stephen and Brett. We *have* to do A, IMHO. The "good" > jar is what was released. We should not be distributing non-released > jars from java-repository at all, much less non-released jars named to > look like releases.
Well, it looks like there is absolutely no consensus at all on this issue. Opinions seem to be fairly evenly spread across all possible actions. However there does seem to be general consensus (though with some dissenting voices) that a 1.0.1 release is a good idea. So I've created a Wiki page for CLI describing the current situation and that the resolution for the ibiblio jars is "under debate". I have also modified the 1.0.1 proposed website to point people to the wiki for further info; that means we have the *capability* to push out a 1.0.1 release without waiting for this debate to be resolved - if a release vote passes. Regards, Simon --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
