Hi Simon, Simon Kitching wrote on Tuesday, August 02, 2005 10:00 AM:
> [AARGH - I hate top-posting!] me too. > I'm not opposed to this proposal. Commons-logging already > creates a proxy Log object for each underlying real logger > object, so at the worst the name can be remembered at the Log > object level as far as I can see. In other words, this > functionality should be possible to implement whatever the underlying > logging library. > > And I'm generally convinced by the emails to this thread that > all reasonable logging libraries provide a way for logging > objects to return their name anyway. > > I don't personally have any need for this feature, but it > seems that people with reasonable credentials do. Fine. > So overall I'm in favour of some kind of implementation of > this feature. Commons-logging needs to be *very* careful > about adding features to its API but this seems to me like > one that passes the necessary tests. > > If you were to create a bugzilla entry with an implementation > of this feature and supporting unit tests [and assuming > no-one else votes against it] I will review and commit it > sometime in the next few weeks. OK. > Note, however, that commons-logging isn't making much > progress at the moment, and several issues standing in the > way of a new release. So there's no guarantee of when the > next release might actually be pushed out. Well, the requests started two years ago, so we have already waited some time. At least I will be glad if it gets into the next version. > Regards, > > Simon > > PS: Two Joerg Schaibles? How confusing! No, just two Jörgs, but I did not want that somebody assumes, that we try to urge somebody about this feature using different aliases, just because of the same (first) name. - Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
