2 or 3 for me. Sun no longer support them, and I don't think anyone would be developing new code for them. I don't think commons-exec would be an important thing to have running on the MS VM :)
- Brett Niklas Gustavsson wrote: > Hi Jerome > > Thanks for a lot of really good feedback and ideas! I will come back > to some of the other stuff later on, but first I think we need to > discuss on of the points you bring up: > > jerome lacoste wrote: > >> * run on the oldest SDK possible > > > I think there are three ways to go: > 1. Full support for 1.1+ > 2. Limited support for 1.1-1.2, full support for 1.3+ > 3. No support for 1.1-1.2, full support 1.3+ > > Runtime.exec(String[] cmd, String[] env, File workingDir) was added in > 1.3. A lot of the Ant trickery going on the the current code is to > handle working directories on older (pre 1.3) JVMs. This include most > of the CommandLaunchers and the shell/Perl scripts. > > The middle road would be to only support execution in the current > directory only on 1.1. > > So, what do you all think? I'm personally lucky enough to mostly be on > 1.3 and 1.4 these days, but I'm fine with either choice here. If you > think we should aim for 1.1, I would prefer option 2 to ease our pains > a little bit. If we make the CommandLaunchers pluggable (and I think > we should), someone who would really need working directory support on > 1.1 could potentially write their own CommandLauncher. > > /niklas > > ------------------ > Niklas Gustavsson > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.protocol7.com > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
