The "contribution" comes almost entirely from the Ant codebase. Sorry if I didn't make that clear from the commit message.
The exceptions: - changed structure (merged classes such as ExecTask and Exec, refactored out environment). - addition of the o.a.c.e.launcher package which was created by Niklas. I gave it a once over before committing it. Niklas is not a yet a committer, so doesn't have a CLA. I was under the impression his contribution was goverened by the same rules as any patch submitted to the mailing list. I have asked that he use bugzilla in future. I was also under the impression that the sandbox was equipped to house code in the same way as the incubator as official releases are not made from there. What have I missed and how do we need to correct it? In the worst case, I can svn cp from Ant (as they are soon going to SVN), and stepwise refine it to include these improvements. Do we still need a CLA/grant from Niklas? - Brett Noel J. Bergman wrote: >Re: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/commons/sandbox/exec/trunk/ > >Whoa, hello! > >This thing is labeled as an initial contribution, and the SVN tree was just >created for it in July. It doesn't matter if it is a sandbox project or >not. New codebases *MUST* be imported through the Incubator, at least in >terms of recording the IP clearance. > >Where is the CLA for Niklas Gustavsson? Where is the Software Grant for the >codebase? What are the origins of this codebase, since that isn't clear >from the e-mail archives. > >Please explain what I am missing or correct this situation immediately. > > --- Noel > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
