DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35963>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35963 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-07 18:38 ------- I agree that the current implementation is inconsistent. It should be no problem that XML elements occurring in the loaded configuration document but don't have text are added to the configuration. To use your example: <configuration> <foo> <bar/> </foo> </configuration> If this file was loaded, conf.containsKey("foo.bar") should return true and conf.getString("foo.bar") should return an empty string, right? What about the <foo> element? ATM the "foo" key is not contained in the configuration object. For the sake of consistency the same results should be returned as for the "foo.bar" key. Do you agree? While this is only a minor change in the source code it will have a major impact. The number of keys in an XMLConfiguration would increase, which might break existing code using this class. What do others think about this? -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
