Oliver Heger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote:
>>[ ] can replace 1.1 without any user or developer visible changes: 1.1.1
>>[ ] might have some developers "gotchas" or user visible changes: 1.2
>>
>>IMHO.
>>
>>
>Okay, then 1.2 would be the number of choice. Fine with me!
Note that this would be _my_ number of choice. I'd be upset if a version
number change from 1.1 (.0) to 1.1.1 would break my application. I'd expect
these versions to be interchangeable (i.e. 1.1.1 only a bug fix release).
1.2 would IMHO mean "watch out, some gotchas"
2.0 would mean "expect heavy breakage and code adjustments". :-)
Regards
Henning
--
Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen INTERMETA GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] +49 9131 50 654 0 http://www.intermeta.de/
RedHat Certified Engineer -- Jakarta Turbine Development -- hero for hire
Linux, Java, perl, Solaris -- Consulting, Training, Development
4 - 8 - 15 - 16 - 23 - 42
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
