DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36215>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36215 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-26 15:25 ------- (In reply to comment #15) I have not had time to get the fix pushed to the trunk, soit will not be in the nightly builds yet. I hope to get around to this today. Both problems have been resolved. The problem with returning 0 was caused by a simple erroneous boundry value check. The poor accuracy for small cumulative probabilities was the result of a truncation error when performing 1.0 - verySmallProbability in certain circumstances. Of note, the performance for these routines is quite poor for large population sizes. I plan to address these limitations and improve performance post release 1.1. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
