James Carman wrote:
Well, what does the [lang] "team" think about this approach (just letting Class.forName() throw the ClassNotFoundException)? Does this work for you guys? I have added a patch to issue 36512 which includes code to implement it this way (my latest patch). Are there any votes against this method being implemented this way? If not, do you guys care if I go ahead and commit it (I'll wait a while for votes)? Since I'm not a "normal" [lang] committer, I don't want to step on anyone's toes.
You are welcome to check it in, but you will need to add your name to the [lang] committers in project.xml. Other committers will then review it :-)
For reference, lang strives to avoid NPE, so typically I would want a null input to yield a null output.
Stephen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
