On Fri, 2005-09-09 at 18:43 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote: > On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 13:13 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote: > > On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 21:10 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote: > > > On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 20:44 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote: > > > > there's been a recent request to cut a new (dated) snapshot from HEAD. > > > > (unless there are objections) i'll cut and upload a new dated snapshot > > > > no earlier than 2400 GMT friday 9th september. > > > > > > Deploying a snapshot to www/cvs.apache.org/repository is ok by me. > > > > > > The RELEASE-NOTES.txt file should probably be updated to indicate what > > > changes are in the snapshot... > > > > the deployment would just be a jar and so would not contain the release > > notes. do you think that it's worthwhile updating just the copy of the > > release notes in SVN? > > It's just that I assume that people will always want to know "what's > fixed/what's been added in this snapshot". > > If there's a tag in SVN for the snapshot then I think it's a good idea > to update the release notes so that people can look at the > RELEASE-NOTES.txt file in the tag to see what the snapshot jar changes > are.
good point. seems best to create a tag and so updating the release notes makes sense. maybe it'd be worth creating a SNAPSHOT best practise document... > But if the snapshot jar is just going to be generated from HEAD of trunk > then I guess it's less important. > > In practice, there are only about 3 commits since the last official > release anyway I think, so updating the release notes won't be a bit > task. If it rains this weekend I might find time to do it anyway. i see you've already done that. cheers :) - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
