Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Agree with Robert's comments and am also +0, with three additional comments=
>:
>* The ant build depends javamail 1.3.2, while the maven POM references 1.3.=
>3.=20
>The ant build should be updated to match the POM
Ok, will do.
>* It would be good to provide some instructions in the README, release note=
>s=20
>or web site on what users have to do to get javamail and activation manuall=
>y=20
>deployed locally so the maven and ant builds work.
There is some information on how to get javamail and activation in
RELEASE-NOTES.txt. If more information is wanted, patches are always
welcome.
>* Before cutting the final release, you should update the index.xml page to=
>=20
>eliminate the reference to RCs
Yes. The release will be "based on RC8", not "RC8 as 1.0". I will have
to change the references from RC8 to 1.0 anyway. Currently, I'm
waiting for Eric to call the vote to close and post a result.
Best regards
Henning
--
Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen INTERMETA GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] +49 9131 50 654 0 http://www.intermeta.de/
RedHat Certified Engineer -- Jakarta Turbine Development -- hero for hire
Linux, Java, perl, Solaris -- Consulting, Training, Development
4 - 8 - 15 - 16 - 23 - 42
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
