Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> And do we want to offer 1.3 support, given that 1.3 is still alpha?
> I would prefer not to; better to provide a minor release after
> log4j 1.3 is released than provide ahead-of-time support and get
> it wrong. Actually, for the current release we could provide a
> Log4JLogger class with TRACE support, and worry about splitting
> into log4j1.2/1.3 when the new version comes along. I would still
> like to see the version-checking stuff in the Log4J12Logger class
> kept, though.
The long stretches of inactivity at JCL would suggest that we better
put some support in there now or we might have a situation where 1.3
is out and JCL has no support for it for quite a while.
Best regards
Henning
--
Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen INTERMETA GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] +49 9131 50 654 0 http://www.intermeta.de/
RedHat Certified Engineer -- Jakarta Turbine Development -- hero for hire
Linux, Java, perl, Solaris -- Consulting, Training, Development
4 - 8 - 15 - 16 - 23 - 42
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
