On 10/13/05, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 12:38 -0400, James Carman wrote: > > > Is there a "standard" mock objects implementation that we are supposed to > > use? > > i'm not sure that we're really into this kind of 'standards': but it is > worth asking the community if they have any preferences (and why)... > > > I like both EasyMock and JMock, but I'm starting to lean more towards > > JMock for readability. Any thoughts > > only one: both have compatible licenses :)
you might want to have a look at this article, it also contains some discussion of the differences between EasyMock and JMock: http://www.martinfowler.com/articles/mocksArentStubs.html Tom --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
