Torsten Curdt wrote:
Equals and HashCodeBuilder are great tools
and usually a straight call to the reflection
based building does what I need.
...but in case there is only a single member
that you want to take out of the picture you have
to explicitly build the full Builder yourself.
I'd like to propose to add a simple matcher
class that can be passed in. Would make my
life a lot easier.
I would be happy to consider additional protected methods to filter out
fields, but not a generic matcher interface. Its about avoiding the
'framework' creep in commons-lang.
Stephen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
