Oliver Zeigermann <oliver.zeigermann <at> gmail.com> writes: > But even more, may understanding is that the user will never see an > XAResource and will never try to get an instance of it. It simply is > an interface between the transaction manager of your container and > your resource manager.
Ok, this might be the reason for my different views up to now. Is an XAResource always supposed to be accessed through JCA, i.e. the resource adapter is an implementation of JCA? I got the impression when having again a look on your transactional Map implementation. Unfortunately the JTA spec does not speak about this point (JCA), only mentions JDBC and JMS, which might be an analogy here. Yet another spec/API I have to look at ... and maybe the JTA spec makes more sense with this changed view. Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
