On 11/20/05, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 22:39 +0000, Stephen Colebourne wrote: > > > I'm not forcing anybody into anything :-), but I think these do provide > > benefits to our users if we can share them across more commons > > components. I would like us to try and agree on one naming convention > > for the javadocs if at all possible. > > > > Currently these changes are implemented on [collections] and [io], and > > are on their way (all or in part) in [validator] & [beanutils]. > > if we had these templates somewhere central (commons-build/templates, > say) then they could be maintained centrally and any improvements would > be shared more easily. this might also make things easier for new > projects. opinions? > <snip/>
Indeed, I expressed a similar opinion in r345388 [1] I began tracing the generation to the point where a cursory glance seemed to reveal that the template locations were hard-coded, at which point, I abandoned that idea for lack of time. -Rahul [1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jakarta-commons-dev&m=113227439016673&w=2 > - robert > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
