DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32573>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32573 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-11-21 19:29 ------- (In reply to comment #20) > Are you really running without synchronisation? Yes, before we hit this bug we were running without synchronization. Now we wrapped the LRUMap in a Collections.synchronizedMap(). > Is there any chance that mutliple threads are accessing the map? Yes, multiple threads are reading and writing the map. Off course in this case it was stupid to not use synchronized access in the first place as LRUMap does not explicitly state that it is threadsafe... -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
