2005/11/23, Joerg Heinicke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Oliver Zeigermann <oliver.zeigermann <at> gmail.com> writes: > > > To me it seems generatedUniqueTxId does exactly as advertised in > > Javadocs. Don't you agree? > > No. :) This dismisses my argument about externally generated ids, yes. But two > different threads calling generateUniqueTxId() at the same time still get the > same "unique" id as the first thread calling this method does not "preserve" > the > id. So the current implementation does not fulfill the "contract" mentioned in > the Javadocs.
Argh! That's right, I guess :( Any idea how to solve this? Oliver --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
