On 11/30/05, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Recently, while looking at a codebase that uses Commons Chain, I was > drawn to the top commit message for ContextBase [1]. > > I'm interested in knowing what the developer (and user too) opinions > are on this topic. Has anybody made any progress on this? > > Does anyone have a preference among - > > * Keep base impls inherently serializable, but let subclass > implementors make their own decisions about serializability. This is > probably a good idea for any Commons library, since interfaces can't > be "un-inherited" (quoting the commit message). I think this action > will warrant a major release, and rework on ContextBase (to not > inherit HashMap) amongst other things.
Whats wrong with HashMap - it implements Serializable? Niall --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
