DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37727>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37727 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-12-01 07:32 ------- So the reasoning is (I hope you're right, it'll be good to be wrong here) - * BasicMessage has this field - Object[] values * The purpose of these "values" is to serve as replacement values in a MessageFormat * There is no restriction on replacement values for a MessageFormat to be serializable, MessageFormat will just use the toString() operator while substituting as a String replacement value * Therefore, one may not guarantee serializability of BasicMessage The rest is just a cascading effect since BasicMessage's go everywhere. Am I being too convoluted about some corner cases? ;-) The more I think about the above, there is little that can be done either way. And I agree with you when you say that there is little that we can do with the other classes we *surely* know are not serializable. Maybe its best to leave a "known issue" in the release notes about these and move on? -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
