Brett Porter wrote:
It was intentionally breaking, I think. I was told that it tightening
up conformance. Others are welcome to pursue it further, this isn't
really my realm of expertise.
Brett, would you have a copy of the mails ?
Such a strengthening would be related to a reported non-conformance
issue, or?
I agree. It should be fixed at either the Jelly or Jaxen end, but if
nobody is stepping up to do so (and I certainly can't), then turn off
the nags and put it in jira would be my vote.
Maybe I find time to hit this...
paul
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
