On 12/5/05, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>I don't much like the idea of adding dependencies to each of the > >>individual POMs, but understand that this makes the dependency > >>explicit, which is a good thing. So I guess I am +0 for this > >>approach. Actually +1 as in "will help" if others agree we should go > >>this route instead of the updatePlugins approach. > > > > I'm more than happy with the updatePlugins approach. It's KISS at its best. > > ;-) > > > > I remain -1 on reverting to extending the commons-build POM > > I agree that we should not extend the commons-build POM. However we > could do with a way to share stuff. > > I have in my mind that what we need is a commons maven plugin. It would:
+1 I was thinking the exact same thing. Maybe we can find some time to hack on it at the ApacheCon. Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
