My apologies, I was not aware of the legal-discuss list.  Will move there
now.  Thanks Rahul!

-- 
Frank W. Zammetti
Founder and Chief Software Architect
Omnytex Technologies
http://www.omnytex.com
AIM: fzammetti
Yahoo: fzammetti
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Tue, December 6, 2005 3:52 pm, Rahul Akolkar said:
> Please allow me to suggest taking these questions to legal-discuss@
>
> Though there may be many subscribed to this list who are quite well
> informed about licensing, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is probably not a good forum
> for these discussions.
>
> Marked OT.
>
> -Rahul
>
>
> On 12/6/05, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Yesterday I asked the question of compatibility betweeen the LGPL and
>> ASL
>> licenses, and today I'd like the ask the same, inserting the MPL for
>> LGPL.
>>
>> IA-(of course)-NAL, but my reading of the MPL would seem to be
>> compatible
>> with the ASL, and even as far as integrating the MPL code directly goes.
>> The usual attribution considerations and notices apply, but that's the
>> case with the ASL anyway, so not a problem.  Otherwise, I personally
>> don't
>> see anything that would seem to conflict.  Can anyone confirm or deny
>> this
>> conclusion?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> --
>> Frank W. Zammetti
>> Founder and Chief Software Architect
>> Omnytex Technologies
>> http://www.omnytex.com
>> AIM: fzammetti
>> Yahoo: fzammetti
>> MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to