Another query, are you happy that you will never want to add a method to
FileObject, or any other interface in VFS?
Commons tends to be strict about not allowing changes like this.
Possible solutions to adding a method in the future are
- to create a FileObject2 subinterface
- to go to version 2.0
Alternatively define FileObject (and possibly other interfaces) as an
abstract class now, then you don't have the same problems.
At the very least, if you think that you might change the interface, you
should add in the javadoc that it might change in v2.0.
Stephen
Mario Ivankovits wrote:
Hi!
Even if the last vode passed I decided to restart the voting based on RC7.
RC7 is now using commons-net 1.4.1 and built using the jdk1.3 compiler
also some rearrangements have taken place to accommodate to our
guidlines (e.g. include xdocs into src distribution)
As previously posted please find the RC7 at
http://people.apache.org/~imario/vfs
Please vote:
[ ] +1 I support this release and am willing to help
[ ] +0 I support this release but am unable to help
[ ] -0 I do not support this release
[ ] -1 I do not support this release, and here are my reasons
Sorry if this revote bothers you, but after all what happens in the last
days on our mailinglist I thought if would be better to do so.
Thanks!
Mario
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
