Re: [jcl] mocks

[Torsten Curdt]

On 13.12.2005, at 16:00, James Carman wrote:

For bytecode engineering, are you suggesting that we use something like

CGLIB at runtime

I'd -1 that one as well! ... KISS - keep it simple and stupid!

...which is not exactly what the current JCL is like and why
so many people complained in the past. It's also what should
be the focus for the next version.

cheers
--
Torsten

PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part