configuration also has MANIFEST issues with specification-version and implementation-vendor-id. as more people are starting to use and understand 1.5 JVMs, this is going to start to become a bigger and bigger problem. however, it's a maven bug (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPJAR-51) and ATM i'm not sure when it'll be fixed.
so, i'm going to +1 this release (since it's been in the pipes for a long time) but give advanced warning that i may start to -0 or -1 in the future when component don't have MANIFEST's that support the extension mechanism. - robert On Sat, 2005-12-10 at 11:52 +0100, Oliver Heger wrote: > Oliver Heger wrote: > > >Hi community, > > > >after some constructive critics in the last vote thread we have created > >another RC [1, 2]. I hope that all relevant issues have been addressed. > > > >So I would like to reopen the vote: > >--------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > [x] +1 I support this release and am willing to help > > [ ] +0 I support this release but am unable to help > > [ ] -0 I do not support this release > > [ ] -1 I do not support this release, and here are my reasons > >--------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > (forgot my own vote) > > Oliver > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
