I intend to resuscitate compress, but I wouldn't want to have to maintain the existing API (though not far off).
Might be best to svn cp them into your own tree. - Brett Mario Ivankovits wrote: > Hi! > > What to do with [compress]? > > There is no development on the compress package, but VFS depends on it. > As you know, this is a show stopper for VFS to release. > > The question now is if we should promote compress to proper and cut a > release or if I should import the required classes into the VFS codebase. > The latter might mean that compress will get dormant at all. > > Personally I would like to keep compress as I hope sometimes in the > future we well see new compression algos too. > Might It be an option to move compress to [codec]? With some good will > ;-) we can argue that it fits not that bad. > > > Ciao, > Mario > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
