On 1/4/06, Emmanuel Bourg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Oliver Heger wrote: > > > > With clover there seem to be some licensing issues: > > > > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37454 > > We have an open source license for Clover, it works for the org.apache.* > packages only. I'm not sure this allows us to redistribute it though.
That is quite unlikely because the license is granted to the Apache foundation. I'd think that only Apache committers are allowed to use it. Though to be sure you might want to check with the legal mailing list. > https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/donated-licenses/clover/ > > Covertura looks fine for the source packages we release. However when I > work on the code coverage I appreciate the more detailed information > provided by Clover. We can use both tools: Clover privately for the > coverage work, and Covertura for the public reports. What would be the reason for that ? The reports are not covered by the Clover license unless they contain a significant part of the source of Clover (quite unlikely). Therefore, we should be able to publish them without any problems. The same problem would btw. apply to Cobertura because it's is GPL'd. Tom --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
