DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38083>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38083 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|WORKSFORME | ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-06 01:51 ------- I hope I haven't annoyed anyone by committing the first cut of this. This is based on your last patches attached here. The LineIterator also has a nextLine() method which I have added and tested. As such, the most specific class possible should definitely be returned from the Utils classes, which is what I have done. I have also clarified the close, and added a closeQuietly(). Future iterators could be CharacterIterator, ByteIterator etc. The question is whether these should each be separate iterators or just one big iterator. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
