DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38152>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38152 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-06 02:22 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Well, technically these changes are incorrect, since the packages were > correct > at the time the derivation happened. I'm not even sure if this is worth > doing, > but for the changes to make sense, you'd also have to dig up the > corresponding > Subversion revision number, since the revision numbers there now are not > useful. > > Personally, I'd be tempted to just leave it as is. Actually I did some research in the struts svn repo and I couldn't find any clue that struts did put classes in org.apache.http.action at some point. At least in the released trees ActionMessage was always in o.a.s.action. Just curious: from which tree were the classes derived ? IMHO now that the revision number connection is lost we should get rid of the derivation info altogether. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
