On 1/9/06, Dion Gillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sounds good to me! > +1 > <snip/>
Cool. I'll give this thread the rest of the week before moving forward. -Rahul > On 1/10/06, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > JEXL developers - > > > > Any objections to me adding myself to the JEXL component? > > > > I will be starting small -- fixing typos and broken/obsolete links and > > republishing the website etc. Over time, I'm looking at adding to the > > JexlContexts and JexlExprResolvers. For example, some ideas include: > > > > * A "TreeJexlContext", which is backed by a tree of contexts, where > > one may point to a current context node and variable resolution > > bubbles up to the root until the variable is found (or fails at root). > > > > * A "ScopedJexlContext", to support multiple scopes/contexts, > > allowing differentiation of the type context1.foo and context2.foo > > > > * An "ImplicitObjectsJexlContext", where contexts may be populated > > with implicit objects for a particular environment that aren't lost on > > JexlContext#setVars(Map) -- potentially handled by having a decorated > > JexlExprResolver instead. > > > > As a sidebar, Commons SCXML now supports using JEXL expressions in > > SCXML documents [1]. I have use cases similar to the suggestions above > > and some other usecases may potentially pop up as I think some more > > about this. > > > > -Rahul > > > > [1] http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?rev=367112&view=rev > > <snap/> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
