Remembered there was a discussion about membership of the w3c. A quick search gave me only this
though : http://www.apache.org/foundation/records/minutes/2001/board_minutes_2001_10_17.txt
Mvgr,
Martin
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On 1/18/06, Paul Libbrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You definitely need to send such a wish to the general xml list at least.
<snip/>
Sounds good, thanks. Will move this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] when I get a chance.
Note also much w3c interaction can be done without membership...
<snap/>
True, though the members only sections interest me, and may possibly
be of interest to others as well. I'll ask.
-Rahul
paul
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On 1/16/06, Tim OBrien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<snip/>
...this brings up another issue, I think it would be beneficial for the ASF to
join the W3C, but
we're currently not a Member organization.
<snap/>
FWIW, I'd like to see this happen as well. I believe Commons SCXML is
an example where we're beginning to see useful interactions between
the ASF and the W3C, and IMO, the ASF can only gain by being a W3C
member.
<snip/>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
