I back you up Greg. Indeed, we are only using those because of core/xml related changes (xml pipeline / xml namespace) introduced to support those xsd declarations (but are by far more than that)
Paul Libbrecht has worked on those http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JELLY-214 http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JELLY-213 Regarding releasing as RC, I am +1 on this, but after-all, that's only my silent vote :-) Regards Diogo > Hi list, > > As recently and quickly discussed on irc with Dion, I was wondering if > there would be any possible plans for releasing jelly and > jelly-tags-xml. I'm writing as one of the xdoclet2 developers: we > currently depend on post-1.0 snapshots of both of -core and -tags-xml, > and, as you might guess, we'd very much like to switch back to stable > releases. > > As far as I can tell, the only reason we use these versions is because > they added support for xsd declarations in generated xml documents. > (And xdoclet2 has plugins to generate j2ee descriptors which require > an xsd declaration) > > Of course we'd be very keen on testing any RC, and our test codebase > might help in that respect. > > Does this sound feasible / would anyone be interested in pushing this out > ? > > Thanks, > > greg > > > ps: the snapshots we currently use are actually timestamped versions: > commons-jelly-20050813.225330 & commons-jelly-tags-xml-20050823.222913 > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
