On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 18:30 +1300, Simon Kitching wrote: > Hi, > > Given that log4j 1.3 still hasn't released, I would like to revert the > name of the log4J12Logger back to Log4JLogger for the 1.1 release, and > remove the Log4J13Logger.
+1 > The name-change will break any config files that explicitly specify that > logger name. That breakage will have to occur eventually as long as the > log4j team keep to their plan of making a binary-incompatible release. > However I think we've got enough in this release without buying into > that issue too. In addition, I hate guessing the future on this; if we > release a Log4J13Logger class and then it doesn't work with the real > log4j13 that would be embarrassing. > > Any objections to reverting to the old naming and removing Log4J13Logger > for now? [NB: I wrote it :-]. go ahead consider taking a tag before hand to make it trivial to get it back again. - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
