DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38075>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38075 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-19 21:35 ------- Yes, this sounds reasonable. When working on the refactoring of the internal node structures used by HierarchicalConfiguration I had the idea of a different Configuration class, which is very similar to SubsetConfiguration, but more light weight. The subset() method in HierarchicalConfiguration as it is implemented ATM is not really efficient because it involves copying of whole sub trees. For the special case that the subset contains only a single node (which would be the case for this use case: a list of subset configurations, each of which represents one configuration node), a specialized SubnodeConfiguration could be used. This class would wrap a (sub) node of a parent configuration and would perform all of its operations directly on this node and its children. So manipulations at the SubnodeConfiguration or its parent would directly be visible to each other. I will do some experiments with this idea. But whatever the outcome is, this feature request in any case makes sense. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
