DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38309>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38309 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-23 13:49 ------- (In reply to comment #13) > 1. You are importing com.sun.net.ssl.X509TrustManagern and > com.sun.net.ssl.SSLContext. Are these allowable imports under the terms of > the > Apache License? I don't know the answer, it is a question. We have been > recently hit with licensing questions and I don't want to go through this > again > without checking first. I really don't know about legal, this import its into JSSE (http://java.sun.com/products/jsse/LICENSE.html), because i want use ftps, with JDK 1.3, but... there is a correspondent Java 1.4 classes for com.sun.net... > 2. Does this import require importing any additional libraries, or is this > class included in a J2SDK library. If so, which version? This import require Java 1.3 & JSSE. > 3. FTPSClient overrides the retrieveFile() method from FTPClient. I am not > an > expert in FTPS but shouldn't similar overrides be provided for storeFile(), > deleteFile()? How about listFiles() and listNames()? Can you point us to a > definition of the FTPS protocol that defines what is required? Now, following the paul advice, now only overwrite _openDataConnection_ > 4. Assuming all the above are answered, we would like some JUnit tests to be > created for the new classes. The present tests can serve as a model for you. I attach one junit, to test, with a "local ftps server" of the "junit machine". > 5. Finally, the files need to have the Apache License. Add. > Please do not take this the wrong way. I am being very demanding and > legalistic > here, because I know that the Jakarta project is being closely watched from > some > quarters, but I very much want this to go forward if at all possible. > > I also think that this is not the place for this discussion to be continued. > Now that we are on to legal as well as coding issues, the discussion should > move > back to the commons-dev mailing list, which is where I am moving it. Don't worry... and thanks for all. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
