On Fri, 20 Jan 2006, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 1/17/06, J?rg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Stephen Colebourne wrote on Monday, January 16, 2006 11:13 PM: > >> > > > J?rg Schaible wrote: > > >> The release plan is available now: > > >> http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/id/1.0ReleasePlan > > Looks good, though we may actually want to keep > PrefixXXXGeneratorIdentifiers. See below. > > > > > > > "Refactor PrefixXXXGeneratorIdentifier implementations" > > > This should be done with great care. id generation is very performance > > > and sync sensitive in many systems. > > > > I am sure, Phil will take care of it, if he starts refactoring. But > > basically there is not much >difference by just decorating an arbitrary > > StringIdentifierGenerator and prefixing the >resulting id compared to the > > current implementations - and the >AbstractStringIdentifierGenerator could > > implement a protected nextStringBufferIdentifier >method. Talking about > > transformation is another issue though ... > > I have started working on this. What I had in mind was just a simple > facility for creating composite identifiers created by concatenating > results of an array of generators. This does add overhead for the > prefix identifiers, so we may actually want to keep these. > Synchronization is a separate issue. I will commit some code this > weekend to look at.
Phil, could you create a bugzilla entry for this? I might have something to contribute. michael --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
