On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 22:07 +0000, robert burrell donkin wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 10:05 +0100, Boris Unckel wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > 
> > robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > i've uploaded RC1 to http://people.apache.org/~rdonkin/commons-logging/.
> > > please check and test the release candidate and report any mistakes or
> > > problems. 
> > > 
> > Just to minor things:
> > - docs/api is empty, can be removed (docs/apidocs contains javadoc)
> > 
> > - It is comiled with 1.4.2_04 (version from manifest.mf):
> > <!-- Version of java class files to generate. -->
> >   <property name="target.version" value="1.1"/>
> > 
> > <!-- Version of java source to accept -->
> > <property name="source.version" value="1.2"/>
> > 
> > The release notes state it could be build for 1.1, but it is not tested.
> > Does the JDK1.4 compiler really produce 1.1 code? If not, I would set the
> > target.version to 1.2, to avoid errors which do not clearly lead to the
> > wrong class version.

Yes I believe the JDK1.4 compiler really does produce 1.1 code when told
to. Why wouldn't it?

We can't be sure that the resulting jar actually *does* run correctly on
java 1.1 because the unit tests require 1.2-or-later features. However
there's a good chance that the commons-logging.jar file *does* work on
jvm1.1, so it makes sense to compile for that target so that people who
care about that have at least an opportunity to try it.


> > 
> > Second 1.4.2_10 is the actual version, for a new release I would prefer the
> > latest compiler (even if there a just minor or no changes). JCL releases
> > have a long life cycle, and will be widely spread, so it makes sence to
> > compile with the latest available version.
> 
> sorry - my bad 
> 
> it got very late for me last night and i was too tired to check :(
> 
> when i cut logging releases i do two compile runs (one with 1.2 and one
> with a 1.4 JVMs) and then assemble the jars. used the wrong JVM to
> assemble them. 

Why is it necessary to use two different JVMs?

Regards,

Simon


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to