On 02.02.2006, at 00:06, Jörg Schaible wrote:

Torsten Curdt wrote on Wednesday, February 01, 2006 12:25 PM:

This could be useful, but would need to be done without a
dependency on commons-lang.

We already talked about that at the ApacheCon.

Maybe it would useful to loosen such requirements by using tools like
"minijar"

  http://vafer.org/blog/tag/minijar

or "proguard + jarjar"

  http://proguard.sourceforge.net/
  http://tonicsystems.com/products/jarjar/

we add the dependency so we don't duplicate code but strip the
unnecessary classes and inline the remaining.

WDYT?

Looking at proguard, this might be enough. Why do you think, jarjar is also necessary ?

Jarjar is better suited for the inlining. Unfortunately proguards
configuration sucks quite bad and it require all transitive deps
to be analyzed. Both are GPL btw.

That's why I came up with minijar ...mainly for using it for jci.

cheers
--
Torsten

Attachment: PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to