DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUGĀ·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38499>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED ANDĀ·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38499





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-02-07 19:52 -------
Hmmm...

I've spent a little while looking into this...

Figures (bytes):
  commons-logging-1.1-RC3.jar             49202 -> 49399   +~0.4%
  commons-logging-adapters-1.1-RC3.jar    21151 -> 21356   +~1%
  commons-logging-api-1.1-RC3.jar         39167 -> 39368   +~0.5%

I don't think that the difference in size is large enough to be an issue.

But it seems ATM to be of use (as sandy says) only for the main jar of an applet
(which JCL isn't). 

Opinions?



-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to