DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37484>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37484 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-08 06:50 ------- Thanks for the info Luke. I would like to see JCL 1.1 be compatible with java 1.1, though it isn't a pre-requisite for the release. As Robert says, a statically-bound version should work. As soon as the 1.1 release is made, I'm keen to get started on a JCL 2.0 implementation that would use some kind of "static binding", ie one jar per implementation. In this case, there would be a simple non-TCCL-aware jar that you could use, and a separate TCCL-aware jar for people using servlet container style frameworks. However it isn't too difficult to just catch the NoSuchMethodError in this case. I've committed a change to do that (r375866), so if you could test by building from source, using a nightly build or the next release candidate that would be appreciated. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
