What would make BoundedBuffer more a 4.0 thing as opposed to a 3.2 thing? Or were you saying that we should agree on the contents for 4.0?
-----Original Message----- From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 8:26 PM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [collections] Collections 3.2/4.0 On 2/9/06, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Plan for collections 3.2 > ------------------------ > Agree contents > (notably, I'd like to remove BoundedBuffer) Shuoldn't that be a 4.0 thing? > Check bugs > > Build and release in single jar format > > > Plan for collections 4.0 > ------------------------ > Break collections into smaller jars > (either as one project or multiple) We getting lots of complaints of it being too large? Or just some noisy ones? Bear in mind, if we have a bunch of jars that people will only complain that it's confusing and there are too many jars. > Remove deprecations (maybe to a deprecated jar) Just kill them I reckon; there's only so much effort we should go to maintain legacy things, otherwise it all gets very painful. Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
