On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 12:37 -0500, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > On 2/7/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Specifically with respect to Latka, but applicable to all Commons > > components. > <snip/> > > Thanks for bringing this up, its been something I (and possibly > others) have been wondering as well. > > Add EL to that starting list.
EL is actually an interesting example... > > How do we want to handle released (ie non-sandboxed) components that > > have gone dormant? Do we add a new component called Legacy (or > > something like that)? > > > <snap/> > > Ofcourse we do. As Robert points out there may be separate "legacy" > and "matured beyond belief" categories (even though the second > category has extremely limited membership, IMO), but the undercurrent > still holds -- some components are not supported as well as we'd hope > (I just browsed the archives for unanswered questions, and bugzilla > for unanswered tickets). legacy would be a very misleading term for EL. EL is definitely finished. i wonder whether there's something like a main sequence for components: sandbox -> immature (aka unreleased) -> stable -> mature -> finished and whether we could make use of it... - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
